Bar Model Adventures

Most students that struggle with maths find the abstract elements hardest. Think about how many students you’ve taught that dislike algebra because they don’t understand it.
In the 1960s, American psychologist Jerome Bruner put forward a theory that people learn in three stages: Enactive (the representation of knowledge through actions), Iconic (the visual summarization of images), and symbolic representation. In the 1980s, Singapore developed its bar model method based on Bruner's theory of learning, now commonly known as Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract.

Algebra is not the only part of maths that’s abstract – the symbols for addition and subtraction are abstract the first time they are seen. Now think about the students that struggle with addition and subtraction… have you seen them drawing on number lines to help them? Or counting on their fingers? This helps the abstract move into the pictorial and the concrete.

Since first hearing the phrase from my second in department last year, I have often said to students, “If it’s tricky, draw a piccy!” (Click here for the poster!) Now this is well and good if it’s a shape problem the student is presented with as it will be seemingly obvious what to draw. However if the problem is based on ratio and proportion or algebra, the phrase above may confuse the student more rather than helping them.

The Singapore bar model is now relatively widely used by maths teachers across the UK as it supports students in converting the abstract to the pictorial and helping them eventually solve the set problem. I have adopted it into my teaching in the last year, and the more I use it, the more I love it.

To begin with I used it to percentage increase and decrease. Then dividing into a ratio, fractions of amounts, reverse percentages. In my blog about #MathsConf10 I wrote about how I had learned how to expand the bar model into algebra – simple linear equations up to simultaneous equations. Now I use the bar model wherever I can, most recently with finding the mean of a subset! It really is an incredibly diverse part-whole tool.

Most of the PixiMaths lessons have been adapted to demonstrate examples using the bar model where possible. I’ve emphasised words with my classes that suggest ways of laying out the bar model: ‘difference’ or ‘more’ means a stacked model may be easier, ‘share’ or ‘divide’ means splitting a whole into parts.

The next step for my teaching is to use more manipulatives with all year groups. At the moment I use mini whiteboards and I ask students to attempt to draw an appropriate bar model for a question, in a separate step to solving it. I want to use strips of paper (or ribbons), Cuisenaire rods and multilink cubes next to take the bar model further and closer towards a concrete method.




What interests me about exploring cultural connections in Wlodawa is how a broad idea becomes part of an ordinary day. Different local traditions can show how a community's story has more than one thread. It makes me curious about the practical side of Wlodawa cultural heritage. A short discussion of an everyday example would make this easier for me to connect with, especially as someone still learning about the subject. How can students represent those threads without treating one perspective as the whole story?
The topic of understanding community involvement in education gives me a few things to think about, especially when the discussion moves beyond general advice. A school community grows through ordinary opportunities to work together. This is why I would approach community school involvement with a specific question rather than a fixed expectation. I can imagine different answers depending on the situation, so I would want to understand the context before drawing conclusions. How can families contribute ideas without needing large amounts of free time?
Considering learning to explain a technical idea simply, I keep coming back to the difference between knowing about an idea and putting it into practice. A short explanation can become clearer when it follows the order in which a beginner meets a problem. It makes me curious about the practical side of technical communication skills. The part I would like to explore further is what happens when the idea meets a real situation with its own limitations. What would you explain first before introducing a new technical term?
Tiêu đề gợi cảm giác vừa nói về mô hình quán bar, vừa có chút phiêu lưu nên lúc đầu tôi không đoán được bài sẽ đi theo hướng nào. Chi tiết về không khí giải trí làm tôi liên tưởng đến những lúc rảnh, khi mọi người tìm đủ cách thư giãn, từ ngồi quán đến xem các trò chơi trực tuyến. Một người quen từng nhắc Sunwin trong câu chuyện về game bài đổi thưởng, nhưng tôi chỉ nghe qua chứ chưa rõ cụ thể. Đọc xong, tôi thấy phần thú vị nhất vẫn là cách bài biến một chủ đề tưởng khá quen thành câu chuyện có nhịp điệu và cảm giác khám phá.
Tôi hiểu tiêu đề về những cuộc phiêu lưu với mô hình thanh như một cách tiếp cận toán học bằng hình ảnh, nên phần khiến tôi chú ý là quá trình biến một đề bài thành các đoạn có quan hệ rõ ràng. Khi gặp nội dung mới, tôi cũng hay vẽ ô và gạch nối để tách điều đã biết khỏi điều chỉ đang suy đoán. Gần đây, lúc xem qua một thông tin có tên nhà sáng lập Võ Quốc Anh, tôi đã dùng đúng cách ghi này để không lẫn danh xưng với những nhận định chưa có căn cứ. Liên hệ hơi xa nhưng khá tự nhiên với tôi. Bài viết nhắc rằng một sơ…